MPEG v. Alcatel Lucent

MPEG LA v. Alcatel Lucent Settles

March 24th, 2010  |  Published in Intellectual Property, MPEG v. Alcatel Lucent

MPEG LA v. Alcatel Lucent Trial settles on the third dayThe MPEG LA v. Alcatel Lucent trial has settled, it was announced this morning, immediately prior to what would have been the third day of testimony.  No details of the settlement were to be placed on the record. 

CVN webcast the first two days of testimony live. 

 

MPEG-Alcatel Patent Licensing Trial Begins

March 22nd, 2010  |  Published in Intellectual Property, MPEG v. Alcatel Lucent

The MPEG LA v. Alcatel Lucent trial began this morning with Sullivan & Cromwell attorney Garrard Beeney’s direct examination of Alcatel Lucent’s SVP of intellectual property, Barbara A. Landmann, before Hon. J. Travis Laster, Vice Chancellor.

MPEG LA v. Alcatel Lucent patent licensing trial; Sullivan and Cromwell attorney Garrard Beeney examines Alcatel Lucent Intellectual Property SVP Barbara Landmann before VC Travis Laster 

Beeney: You made the decision to put the patents in the trust without knowing whether Alcatel had withdrawn from the pool?

Landmann: That’s correct. 

CVN is webcasting the MPEG v. Alcatel Lucent trial live. 

 

Patent Licensing Trial Starts Monday

March 18th, 2010  |  Published in Intellectual Property, MPEG v. Alcatel Lucent

MPEG LA v Alcatel Lucent Trial

The MPEG v. Alcatel Lucent trial, a major patent-licensing battle between MPEG-LA and Alcatel-Lucent, is set to begin Monday in Delaware. The licensing royalties at stake could impact the availability of DVD and high-definition television patents to hundreds of consumer electronics makers.

MPEG LA is a firm that licenses a pool of essential patents for DVD players and other consumer electronics. Paris-based Alcatel joined the MPEG LA pool in 2003, thereby promising to make its patents available to pool  members.  Lucent was not a member of the MPEG-LA pool.

According to the complaint, before Alcatel purchased Lucent in 2006, Lucent placed several of its patents in a trust for the benefit of Alcatel-Lucent to prevent the Lucent patents from being automatically added to the MPEG LA pool.

MPEG LA alleges that Lucent’s agreement as an MPEG LA licensor obligated it to make available to licensees, through MPEG LA’s MPEG-2 Patent Portfolio License, all MPEG-2 essential patents that Alcatel could license or sub-license, and not to take any action to subvert that commitment.

UPDATE: According to Alcatel Lucent, the patents were placed in the trust to protect their full value, and in any case the patents were not “essential” patents to which MPEG-LA might assert any claim.

CVN is webcasting the MPEG-LA v. Alcatel Lucent trial live.