Tort

Million dollar verdict in Nikki Beach Club bar brawl trial

November 14th, 2011  |  Published in Court Video, CVN, Negligence, Tort, Verdict

nikkibeachblogA Florida jury awarded plaintiff, David Milian just over $1 million Thursday afternoon in his suit against Miami nightspot Nikki Beach Club. Specifically, the jury awarded $150,000 for loss of earnings, $100,000 for hospital and medical bills from the past and into the future, and $800,000 for pain suffering and mental anguish.

On August 3, 2008 Milian visited Nikki Beach Club with his girlfriend. Near the club’s bathrooms Milian exchanged words with Guido Trinidad and their interactions escalated into a physical altercation. Trinidad hit Milian in the face with a bar glass, creating serious injury and severing the nerves on the right side of his face. Milian brought suit against Nikki Beach Club for pain, suffering, his resulting disability and medical bills of approximately $50,000.

Plaintiff’s attorney, Philip Gerson, stated that a nightclub is required to keep its property reasonably safe by providing adequate security. In his opening statement he alleged that the fight was “both foreseeable and preventable by the nightclub. There was a needless danger. They knew fights, including attacks with glasses, had happened before. They could have prevented the crime but didn’t.”

Mitchel Chusid, of Ritter, Chusid, Bizona & Cohen, represented the defendant night club. Chusid asserted that while the plaintiff did receive injuries on defendant’s property, Nikki Beach Club took the proper precautions to make the nightspot safe. He further stated that the incident happened very quickly while Trinidad was enraged and that club security responded quickly.

Today, while asking for damages between 1 and 2 million dollars, Gerson told the jury, “You are like cashiers at a supermarket. You just add up the items. The amount can be large or the amount can be small. It is whatever comes to you, and you should not be embarrassed if the amount that comes to you in total in this case is large.”  

CVN webcast the Milian v. Nikki Beach Club trial live, gavel-to-gavel.

Subscribe to CVN and watch real live trial video for low monthly prices.

 

Plaintiff seeks damages after losing a limb in sport boat accident

November 14th, 2011  |  Published in Negligence, Products Liability, Safety, Tort

Robin Listman lost her leg in 2001 when she jumped out of an Outboard Marine Corporation ‘Four Winds’ sport boat and struck her leg against the unguarded propeller of the boat. The plaintiff claims that the manufacturer’s failure to include a propeller guard constituted a failure in the design, that is, constituted a defective product.

William Jeanney, the plaintiff’s attorney, noted that approximately 45 people per year were dying from being struck by a boat propellers in 1978. He added that not only was Outboard Marine Corporation (OMC) aware of the propeller-related injury statistics, propeller guards were available and on the market for just this purpose.

Defense attorney listmanblog responded that the propeller had functioned appropriately under the circumstances and that the danger could not be considered ‘unreasonable.’

“This is not a case where the propeller snapped off flew through the air and bopped somebody in the head or the propeller blew up and caught fire,” McNally said. “This is a propeller that is designed to push a speed boat through the water smoothly and efficiently.”

McNally added that “prop[eller] guards don’t work,” asking a rhetorical question to illustrate his point.

“Why don’t any of the boats have prop guards on them now? Is it because all boats defective and dangerous?” he asked. “Of course not. Boats don’t have prop guards on them because they don’t work, they’re dangerous, they’re not required … and in fact independent researchers have recommended that prop guards not be used.”

Both attorneys cited previous OMC development of potential propeller guard prototypes, all of which were terminated for various reasons, to support their arguments. McNally argued the termination of the projects indicated propeller guards do not function well while Jeanney argued that their existence belied the defense’s claim that such guards are unnecessary or ‘dangerous.’

Jeanney asked an engineer to develop a propeller guard that would have prevented Listman’s injury without hindering performance, which they claimed to have done in under 40 hours. “They had the knowledge, the resources, the ability, and the budget to do this,” Jeanney concluded. “It could have been done and it should have been done.”

McNally claimed that Kevin Listman’s use of a different OMC boat “50 times a year” shows that the boat in question — the boat that maimed Robin Listman — is not defective or dangerous.

“He still uses the boat, he uses it with the Listman children,” McNally said. “Mr. Listman does not think that his boat, another OMC boat, is dangerous or defective.”

Jeanney concluded by describing the consequences Listman suffers as a result of the loss of her limb, including issues with the prosthetic limb and medical bills totaling over $200,000.

McNally said in response that the plaintiff lawyers “want millions of dollars,” but that evidence would prove that the boat was not in fact dangerous or defective.

“She will go home with no money,” he added. “It seems a little bit harsh but if that’s what the law requires and what the evidence shows, that’s what you need to do.”

listman1 resized 600

Hydrogen Explosion at Power Plant Results in a $6.9M Verdict

September 9th, 2011  |  Published in Court Video, CVN, Electric Power liability, Explosion, Hydrogen, Negligence, Punitive Damages, Safety, Tort, Utility Co. Liability, Utility Company Liability, Verdict, Wrongful Death

Geoffrey Brown and Brian Swiger Attorneys Hydrogen Explosion TrialTimmons v. Ohio Power Company and American Electric Power Service Corporation (Marshall County, West Virginia) 

A Marshall County, West Virginia jury awarded a verdict of $6,998,940 to the family of Lewis Timmons, a 61-year old resident of Tyler County, West Virginia, who was killed as a result of an explosion in the hydrogen storage area of the Muskingum River power plant owned by the American Electric Power Services Corporation. The jury awarded the family of Lewis Timmons nearly $2,000,000 in compensatory damages, and $5,000,000 in punitive damages. The jury also declared that the estate was entitled to attorney fees.

On August 16, 2011, attorney Geoffrey Brown (Bordas and Bordas) told Judge David W. Hummel a panel of eight jurors during his opening statement, “You will hear that both the Ohio Power Company and the American Electric Power Service Corporation violated their duty of due care and caused the explosion to happen resulting in the death of Mr. Timmons and the destruction of his personal property.”

Mr. Brown explained the inner workings of hydrogen storage systems at power plants and noted specifically the inherent dangers in the defendant’s roof above its hydrogen system and its use of weak copper relief stacks. He also described a similar explosion that occurred in December 2005 at a plant in Moundsville, West Virginia, which prompted safety recommendations that were not acted upon by either defendant.

According to Mr. Brown, the defendant’s decision to neglect known safety concerns at the plant resulted in the fatal explosion that took place on January 8, 2007.

Representing the defendants, defense attorney, Brian Swiger (Jackson Kelly) claimed that the American Electric Power Service Corporation was not provided with notice of any dangers present in its roof or its copper relief stacks.

Mr. Swiger told jurors that the defendants, instead, relied on the expertise of General Hydrogen, the inspector for their hydrogen gas system. He claimed that General Hydrogen never gave the American Electric Power Service Corporation any notice of dangers or “urgent needs” for improvement.

Geoffrey Brown (Bordas and Bordas) and Chris Regan (Bordas and Bordas) appeared on behalf of the plaintiff’s estate. Brian Swiger (Jackson Kelly) appeared on behalf of the defendants. 

A two-week civil trial ensued with testimony from numerous experts, including compressed gas experts. Gavel to gavel coverage is available from Courtroom View Network.

CVN webcast Family and Estate of Lewis Timmons v. Ohio Power Company and American Electric Power Service Corporation

 

 

Tags: Negligence, Utility Company liability, Personal injury, Wrongful death, Electric Power Liability, Explosion, Power Plant Liability, Power Plant explosion, Verdict, Punitive Damages, safety, Hydrogen