Van Zyl v. Fain

Morgan & Morgan Reels In $18.88M Damage Award

January 15th, 2011  |  Published in Negligence, Van Zyl v. Fain

Keith Mitnik and Deon Van ZylIn Van Zyl v. Fain, a man whose spinal cord was severed when he was 22 years-old, leaving him without feeling or motion below the chest, was awarded $18,888,875.70.

In his closing argument on behalf of Deon Van Zyl, Morgan & Morgan’s Keith Mitnik challenged the jury to adequately value Mr. Van Zyl’s permanent loss of the ability to go to the bathroom normally, loss of sexual feeling, atrophied physical appearance, loss of professional calling, reduction of lifespan by 10%, and many more losses.

They jury’s award included $1.252M for future medical expenses, $700K for loss of future earning capacity (Mr. Van Zyl had hoped to become an executive chef), $5M for past pain and suffering, and $11.5M for future pain and suffering, plus additional damages for past medical expenses and past loss of earning capacity.

CVN webcast Van Zyl v. Fain live.

 

 

 

 

Vanzyl v. Fain Damages Trial Underway

January 11th, 2011  |  Published in Negligence, Van Zyl v. Fain

Alexander Clem Morgan and MorganMillions of dollars are at stake in the damages trial Vanzyl v. Fain.

As the result of an a vehicle collision, Deon Van Zyl suffered a transection of the spinal colum at T-6, leaving him a paraplegic at age 22, with no motion or feeling in his body from the chest down.

Morgan & Morgan’s Alexander Clem told the jury that Mr. Vanzyl had been a rugby player and grill cook, with career dreams of becoming an executive chef.  But his injury left him severely disabled, with reduced life expectancy, neurogenic bowel and bladder, fewer career options, and permanent medical difficulties.  Mr. Clem said that economic damages were in excess of $3M, and general damages for pain and suffering even greater.

For the defense, Banker Lopez Gassler’s Dale Parker urged the jury to consider carefully the facts when calculating damages. For example, according to Mr. Parker, Mr. Vanzyl’s house could be made accessible for $50K-$150K, instead of requiring a million-dollar new house. Similarly, Mr. Parker suggested that Mr. Vanzyl was earning very good wages in his new career as teacher and deputy principal, and might not have ever made it to executive chef, from his $12/hour grill chef job at the time of the accident.

CVN is webcasting  Van Zyl v. Fain live.